<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Zoti. F. ishte marr\u00ebsi i nj\u00eb dekreti penal q\u00eb d\u00ebnonte gjob\u00ebn prej 30,000 \u20ac gjob\u00eb sepse n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr pranim n\u00eb ndihm\u00eb juridike falas n\u00eb kurriz t\u00eb shtetit<\/strong> deklaruar dhe v\u00ebrtetuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb gabuar<\/strong> t\u00eb mos ket\u00eb marr\u00eb t\u00eb ardhura q\u00eb nga deklarimi i fundit dhe t\u00eb mos kaloj\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurat minimale, nd\u00ebrsa kontrollet nga Guardia di Finanza treguan se t\u00eb ardhurat reale t\u00eb nj\u00ebsis\u00eb familjare u vler\u00ebsuan n\u00eb 54,025 \u20ac.<\/p>\n I akuzuari - i sigurt p\u00ebr arsyet e tij t\u00eb mira - propozoi kund\u00ebrshtim kund\u00ebr dekreti penal i d\u00ebnimit<\/strong> p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn u vu gjykimi i menj\u00ebhersh\u00ebm. I akuzuari gjithashtu kund\u00ebrshtoi pavlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e njoftimit t\u00eb dekretit t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit penal si dhe dekretin e menj\u00ebhersh\u00ebm t\u00eb gjykimit. P\u00ebr Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb, tregimi i gabuar i dat\u00ebs s\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb dekretin e thirrjes t\u00eb njoftuar t\u00eb akuzuarit p\u00ebrcakton nj\u00eb pavlefshm\u00ebri t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme q\u00eb ndikon n\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrjen e t\u00eb akuzuarit n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb dhe e cila nuk mund t\u00eb rregullohet nga njoftimi i rregullt i dekretit avokatit t\u00eb tij dhe pjes\u00ebmarrjen e tij n\u00eb gjykim, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb pasiguria absolute n\u00eb lidhje me dat\u00ebn e seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore t\u00eb paraqitur n\u00eb thirrjen e d\u00ebrguar t\u00eb akuzuarit p\u00ebrcakton nulitetin absolut t\u00eb dekretit. Atje Gjykata e Strasburgut<\/strong> deklaroi se ka nj\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb artit. 6 GJEDNJ sa her\u00eb q\u00eb instrumentet e ofruara nga ligji i brendsh\u00ebm nuk i p\u00ebrgjigjen parimit q\u00eb nj\u00eb gjykim mund t\u00eb mbahet n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarit, me kusht q\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetohet pa dyshim se ai ka hequr dor\u00eb nga e drejta e tij p\u00ebr t'u paraqitur dhe mbrojtur vetveten.<\/p>\n Ky parim i Gjykata Evropiane e t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut<\/strong> i vendos gjyqtarit komb\u00ebtar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb verifikuar n\u00ebse i akuzuari ka pasur mund\u00ebsin\u00eb t\u00eb dij\u00eb procedurat kund\u00ebr tij kur lind nj\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshje n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb q\u00eb nuk duket menj\u00ebher\u00eb dhe qartazi e pabazuar dhe q\u00eb, n\u00eb rast se konstatohet se d\u00ebnimi u shqiptua p\u00ebrkund\u00ebr ekzistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb nj\u00eb sulmi t\u00eb mundsh\u00ebm ndaj t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarit p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb gjykimin e tij, ka nj\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb rinovoj\u00eb gjykimin ose t\u00eb rihap\u00eb procedur\u00ebn n\u00eb koh\u00eb.<\/p>\n Duke pasur parasysh gjetjet e mbrojtjes, gjyqtari mund t\u00eb deklaroj\u00eb deklarimin penal t\u00eb pavlefsh\u00ebm dhe rrjedhimisht dekretin e menj\u00ebhersh\u00ebm t\u00eb gjykimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin ai i ktheu dokumentet prokurorit p\u00ebr t'i b\u00ebr\u00eb p\u00ebrs\u00ebri njoftime t\u00eb akuzuarit. Ju mund t\u00eb q\u00ebndroni t\u00eb informuar mbi lajmet ligjore p\u00ebrmes blogut ton\u00eb<\/a><\/p>\n Q\u00ebndroni n\u00eb rregull me ne, na ndiqni tutje Instagram<\/a> & Facebook<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Gratuito patrocinio a spese dello Stato e Autocertificazione falsa Oggi discuteremo di un caso affrontato dal nostro studio Il caso Il sig. F. era destinatario di un decreto penale di condanna alla pena di euro 30.000 di multa perch\u00e8 nell\u2019istanza di ammissione al gratuito patrocinio a spese dello Stato dichiarava ed attestava falsamente […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_mbp_gutenberg_autopost":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[175,173,174],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1278"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Gjykimi<\/h3>\n
\nN\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e par\u00eb para gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb vetme, mbrojtja kund\u00ebrshtoi pavlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e dekretit t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb menj\u00ebhersh\u00ebm p\u00ebr shkelje t\u00eb neneve 429 dhe 456 t\u00eb kodit t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs penale pasi kushtet e p\u00ebrmendura n\u00eb art ishin treguar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pamjaftueshme. 429 paragrafi 1 shkronjat C dhe F t\u00eb kodit t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs penale.<\/p>\n
\nI pandehuri, n\u00eb fakt, megjith\u00ebse banues n\u00eb Itali, ishte n\u00eb fakt me vendbanim n\u00eb Mbret\u00ebrin\u00eb e Bashkuar dhe demonstroi, gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb precize dhe rigoroze, se sht\u00ebpia ku ishte b\u00ebr\u00eb njoftimi nuk ishte sht\u00ebpia e tij dhe se familja an\u00ebtar\u00ebt q\u00eb ishin njoftuar p\u00ebr dokumentet nuk ishin an\u00ebtar\u00eb t\u00eb familjes bashk\u00ebjetuese.<\/p>\n\u00c7far\u00eb thot\u00eb Gjykata e Lart\u00eb<\/h3>\n
\nGjykata e Lart\u00eb specifikon q\u00eb nuliteti i thirrjes p\u00ebr gjykim p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pasiguris\u00eb absolute t\u00eb dat\u00ebs s\u00eb seanc\u00ebs s\u00eb paraqitjes ose tregimit t\u00eb gabuar t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj date n\u00eb njoftimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb akuzuarin ose n\u00eb njoftimin p\u00ebr mbrojt\u00ebsin \u00ebsht\u00eb ekuivalente me munges\u00ebn e dat\u00ebs .<\/p>\n\u00c7far\u00eb thot\u00eb Gjykata Evropiane e t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut<\/h3>\n
Rezultati<\/h3>\n
\nSidoqoft\u00eb, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, afati i parashkrimit n\u00eb favor t\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarit po kalonte.<\/p>\n