Tribunali i Liris\u00eb refuzoi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr rishikim nga i dyshuari p\u00ebr krimin e akte persekutuese<\/strong>. Il Tribunali i Liris\u00eb<\/strong> n\u00eb vend t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj ai ishte kufizuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e asaj q\u00eb personi i ofenduar tha para policis\u00eb, nga deklaratat e t\u00eb cilit doli ekzistenca e fakteve q\u00eb i atribuohen t\u00eb dyshuarit, i cili e kishte k\u00ebrc\u00ebnuar personin e d\u00ebmtuar me nj\u00eb t\u00eb keqe t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb madje duke u p\u00ebrpjekur t\u00eb hynte n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e tij.<\/p>\n Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, nj\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb tjet\u00ebr doli nga deklaratat pasuese t\u00eb personit t\u00eb d\u00ebmtuar t\u00eb b\u00ebra te i pandehuri i t\u00eb dyshuarit gjat\u00eb hetimeve mbrojt\u00ebse. N\u00eb thelb, element\u00ebt p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs t\u00eb krimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrmendur n\u00ebarti 612 bis<\/strong> t\u00eb Kodi Penal<\/strong> dhe rrjedhimisht nevojat parandaluese t\u00eb t\u00eb dyshuarit.<\/p>\n Kasacioni n\u00eb fakt, duke e l\u00ebn\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Rishikimit t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb deklaratat e m\u00ebtejshme t\u00eb personit t\u00eb d\u00ebmtuar, duke shkaktuar k\u00ebshtu nj\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb dukshme motivimi (sepse arsyet e reja t\u00eb mbrojtjes ishin t\u00eb lidhura me k\u00ebto deklarata t\u00eb reja) anulon urdhrin e kontestuar. N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast tjet\u00ebr, Gjykata i konsideroi hetimet mbrojt\u00ebse t\u00eb bashkangjitura k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr rishikim t\u00eb pavlefshme, sepse mbrojt\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm mund t\u00eb hetoj\u00eb vet\u00ebm t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat tema t\u00eb hetimit, por, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat pyetje q\u00eb ishin b\u00ebr\u00eb tashm\u00eb nga Policia Gjyq\u00ebsore, ai nuk mundi kthehuni te p\u00ebrgjigjet e dh\u00ebna p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb informacione t\u00eb ndryshme sepse kjo do t\u00eb kishte integruar nj\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb artit. 391 bis cpp<\/strong> paragrafi 4<\/p>\n
\nI dyshuari apeloi n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Supreme, duke pretenduar se Rishikimi<\/strong> nuk kishte marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb arsyet e reja dhe deklaratat e personit t\u00eb d\u00ebmtuar t\u00eb prodhuara nga mbrojtja (pas hetimeve mbrojt\u00ebse) t\u00eb shenj\u00ebs s\u00eb kund\u00ebrt krahasuar me at\u00eb q\u00eb ishte raportuar nga viktima e ndjekjes para policis\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore.<\/p>\nHetimet mbrojt\u00ebse.<\/h2>\n
\nPara s\u00eb gjithash, sjellje e p\u00ebrs\u00ebritur<\/strong> q\u00eb ligji k\u00ebrkon p\u00ebr konfigurimin e krimit t\u00eb duke ndjekur<\/strong>, n\u00eb vend q\u00eb sjellja t\u00eb ndodhte n\u00eb vet\u00ebm 12 or\u00eb.
\nNj\u00eb sjellje e till\u00eb gjithashtu nuk do t\u00eb kishte shkaktuar viktim\u00ebn e ndjekjes n\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb a gjendje e vazhdueshme dhe e r\u00ebnd\u00eb e ankthit<\/strong>, as nuk do t\u00eb kishin p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb a ndryshimi n\u00eb zakonet e jet\u00ebs s\u00eb personit t\u00eb d\u00ebmtuar<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
\nGjykata e Lart\u00eb specifikon q\u00eb Tribunali i Liris\u00eb do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e atyre origjinale deklaratat nga viktima e ndjekjes<\/strong>, mohuar nga hetimet mbrojt\u00ebse t\u00eb kryera nga mbrojtja.<\/p>\nSi t\u00eb kryhen si duhet hetimet mbrojt\u00ebse.<\/h3>\n