<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Domnul. F. a fost beneficiarul unui decret penal care condamna pedeapsa de 30.000 \u20ac amend\u0103 deoarece \u00een cererea de admitere la asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103 gratuit\u0103 pe cheltuiala statului<\/strong> fals declarat \u0219i atestat<\/strong> s\u0103 nu fi primit niciun venit de la ultima declara\u021bie \u0219i s\u0103 nu dep\u0103\u0219easc\u0103 venitul minim, \u00een timp ce verific\u0103rile efectuate de Guardia di Finanza au ar\u0103tat c\u0103 venitul real al unit\u0103\u021bii familiale a fost cuantificat la 54.025 EUR.<\/p>\n Acuzatul - anumite motive \u00eentemeiate - a propus opozi\u021bie \u00eempotriva decret penal de condamnare<\/strong> pentru care a fost articulat\u0103 judecata imediat\u0103. Acuzatul a obiectat, de asemenea, asupra nulit\u0103\u021bii notific\u0103rii decretului de condamnare penal\u0103, precum \u0219i a decretului de judecat\u0103 imediat\u0103. Pentru Curtea Suprem\u0103, indicarea eronat\u0103 a datei audierii \u00een decretul de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 notificat \u00eenvinuitului determin\u0103 o nulitate general\u0103 care afecteaz\u0103 interven\u021bia \u00eenvinuitului \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 \u0219i care nu poate fi remediat\u0103 prin notificarea periodic\u0103 a decretului c\u0103tre avocatul s\u0103u. \u0219i participarea sa la proces, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t incertitudinea absolut\u0103 cu privire la data audierii de \u00eenf\u0103\u021bi\u0219are cuprins\u0103 \u00een cita\u021bia comunicat\u0103 \u00eenvinuitului determin\u0103 nulitatea absolut\u0103 a decretului. Acolo Curtea de la Strasbourg<\/strong> a declarat c\u0103 exist\u0103 o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a art. 6 CEDO ori de c\u00e2te ori instrumentele oferite de legisla\u021bia intern\u0103 nu r\u0103spund principiului conform c\u0103ruia un proces poate fi \u021binut \u00een absen\u021ba acuzatului, cu condi\u021bia s\u0103 se stabileasc\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 echivoc faptul c\u0103 acesta a renun\u021bat la dreptul s\u0103u de a se prezenta \u0219i de a se ap\u0103ra.<\/p>\n Acest principiu al Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului<\/strong> impune judec\u0103torului na\u021bional obliga\u021bia de a verifica dac\u0103 acuzatul a avut ocazia s\u0103 cunoasc\u0103 procedurile \u00eempotriva acestuia atunci c\u00e2nd apare un litigiu asupra acestui punct care nu apare imediat \u0219i v\u0103dit nefondat \u0219i c\u0103, \u00een cazul \u00een care se constat\u0103 c\u0103 sentin\u021ba a fost pronun\u021bat \u00een ciuda existen\u021bei unui poten\u021bial atac asupra dreptului acuzatului de a participa la procesul s\u0103u, exist\u0103 obliga\u021bia de a re\u00eennoi procesul sau de a redeschide procedura \u00een timp util.<\/p>\n Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere constat\u0103rile ap\u0103r\u0103rii, judec\u0103torul nu a putut declara nul decretul penal de condamnare \u0219i, \u00een consecin\u021b\u0103, decretul de judecat\u0103 imediat\u0103 pentru care a returnat documentele procurorului pentru a face din nou sesiz\u0103ri acuzatului. Pute\u021bi r\u0103m\u00e2ne informat cu privire la \u0219tirile juridice prin intermediul blogului nostru<\/a><\/p>\n R\u0103m\u00e2ne\u021bi la curent cu noi, urma\u021bi-ne mai departe Instagram<\/a> & Facebook<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Gratuito patrocinio a spese dello Stato e Autocertificazione falsa Oggi discuteremo di un caso affrontato dal nostro studio Il caso Il sig. F. era destinatario di un decreto penale di condanna alla pena di euro 30.000 di multa perch\u00e8 nell\u2019istanza di ammissione al gratuito patrocinio a spese dello Stato dichiarava ed attestava falsamente […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_mbp_gutenberg_autopost":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[175,173,174],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1278"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Judecata<\/h3>\n
\nLa prima \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 \u00een fa\u021ba instan\u021bei unice, ap\u0103rarea a contestat nulitatea decretului de judecat\u0103 imediat\u0103 pentru \u00eenc\u0103lcarea articolelor 429 \u0219i 456 din codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 \u00eentruc\u00e2t cerin\u021bele men\u021bionate la art erau insuficient indicate. 429 alin.1 literele C \u0219i F din codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103.<\/p>\n
\nDe fapt, inculpatul, de\u0219i rezident \u00een Italia, avea domiciliul \u00een Marea Britanie \u0219i a demonstrat, \u00een cadrul primei \u0219edin\u021be, \u00eentr-o manier\u0103 precis\u0103 \u0219i riguroas\u0103, c\u0103 casa \u00een care s-a f\u0103cut notificarea nu era casa lui \u0219i c\u0103 familia membrii care fuseser\u0103 \u00een\u0219tiin\u021ba\u021bi cu privire la documente nu erau membri ai familiei coabitante.<\/p>\nCe spune Curtea Suprem\u0103<\/h3>\n
\nCurtea Suprem\u0103 precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103 nulitatea cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 din cauza incertitudinii absolute a datei audierii la \u00eenf\u0103\u021bi\u0219are sau a indic\u0103rii eronate a acestei date \u00een notificarea c\u0103tre \u00eenvinuit sau \u00een notificarea c\u0103tre ap\u0103r\u0103tor este echivalent\u0103 cu lipsa datei .<\/p>\nCe spune Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului<\/h3>\n
Rezultatul<\/h3>\n
\nCu toate acestea, \u00eentre timp, se desf\u0103\u0219ura termenul de prescrip\u021bie \u00een favoarea acuzatului.<\/p>\n