{"id":1243,"date":"2021-05-18T12:11:16","date_gmt":"2021-05-18T10:11:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/?p=1243"},"modified":"2021-05-18T12:30:40","modified_gmt":"2021-05-18T10:30:40","slug":"semiliberta-e-detenzione-domiciliare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/semiliberta-e-detenzione-domiciliare\/","title":{"rendered":"Semi-libertate \u0219i deten\u021bie la domiciliu"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Repartizarea procesului c\u0103tre serviciile sociale, semiliberarea \u0219i deten\u021bia la domiciliu<\/h1>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>C\u00e2nd este admisibil \u0219i pentru Camorra.<\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h4>Cazul.<\/h4>\n<p>Curtea de Supraveghere din Roma a respins cererea condamnatului de a putea beneficia de <strong>am\u00e2narea pedepsei pentru boal\u0103 grav\u0103<\/strong>, de<strong>atribuire de prob\u0103 c\u0103tre serviciile sociale<\/strong>, din <strong>semi-libertate<\/strong> \u0219i de <strong>deten\u021bie la domiciliu<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Mai mult, opun\u00e2ndu-se orient\u0103rii Cur\u021bii Supreme, aceasta a decis s\u0103 nu prevad\u0103 cererea de recunoa\u0219tere a colabor\u0103rii imposibile, deoarece condamnatul a expirat acum sentin\u021ba referitoare la infrac\u021biunile impedimentale de \u201eprimul nivel\u201d.<br \/>\nTribunalul de supraveghere a sus\u021binut c\u0103, cu referire la <strong>am\u00e2narea sentin\u021bei<\/strong>, patologiile de\u021binutului nu au fost incompatibile cu deten\u021bia \u00een \u00eenchisoare \u0219i c\u0103 ar putea fi tratate corespunz\u0103tor \u00een cadrul \u00eenchisorii.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen ciuda faptului c\u0103 de\u021binutul avea peste \u0219aizeci de ani, invalid \u0219i era deja beneficiar al deten\u021biei la domiciliu \u00een faza de precau\u021bie, cu o \u00eencheiere a sentin\u021bei apropiate, cu infrac\u021biunea pentru care fusese condamnat\u0103 comis\u0103 cu nou\u0103 ani mai devreme \u0219i cu <strong>&quot;Zile de<\/strong> <strong>eliberare timpurie<\/strong> deja acordat\u0103 favorabil, Curtea de Supraveghere a respins, de asemenea, peti\u021bia de deten\u021bie la domiciliu.<br \/>\nSistemul judiciar de supraveghere \u0219i-a bazat evaluarea doar pe nota conducerii anti-mafie a districtului care a certificat pericolul social al de\u021binutului, precum \u0219i participarea sa efectiv\u0103 la grupul de origine Camorra.<\/p>\n<p>Curtea a subliniat c\u0103 de\u021binutul a fost condamnat \u00een trecut pentru numeroase infrac\u021biuni de c\u0103m\u0103t\u0103rie \u0219i extorcare, folosind for\u021ba intimid\u0103rii provenind din apropierea asocia\u021biei infrac\u021bionale.<br \/>\nPotrivit ap\u0103r\u0103rii, \u00eens\u0103, Curtea nu a justificat \u0219i a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 de\u021binuta \u00eenc\u0103 mai avea leg\u0103turi cu mediul penal \u0219i c\u0103 ar fi putut s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219i noi infrac\u021biuni consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 a existat o schimbare obiectiv\u0103 \u00een compara\u021bie cu momentul \u00een care au fost comise infrac\u021biunile.<br \/>\nMai mult, pentru acelea\u0219i infrac\u021biuni, femeii condamnate i s-a acordat deten\u021bie la domiciliu din cauza capacit\u0103\u021bii sale limitate de a comite o infrac\u021biune.<\/p>\n<h2>Punctul de vedere al Cur\u021bii Supreme.<\/h2>\n<p>Curtea de Supraveghere a Romei a luat \u00een considerare pericolul social al condamna\u021bilor prin gravitatea cazierului judiciar, prin constatarea, cuprins\u0103 \u00een sentin\u021ba de condamnare, a rolului preeminent \u00een grupul Camorra precum \u0219i a utiliz\u0103rii sistematice a mafiei metoda pentru des\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea infrac\u021biunilor de extorcare \u0219i extorcare.<br \/>\nDe asemenea, a constatat c\u0103 leg\u0103turile cu criminalitatea organizat\u0103 erau actuale, precum \u0219i c\u0103 lipsea orice tip de desp\u0103gubire \u00een favoarea victimelor sau resipiscen\u021ba.<\/p>\n<p>Potrivit Cur\u021bii Supreme, \u00eens\u0103, Curtea de Supraveghere nu a explicat de ce arestul la domiciliu nu este adecvat din cauza riscului de recidiv\u0103 a infrac\u021biunilor f\u0103r\u0103 dob\u00e2ndirea unor elemente care s\u0103 demonstreze reluarea leg\u0103turilor cu asocia\u021bia Camorra \u00een perioada foarte lung\u0103 a patru ani \u0219i jum\u0103tate \u00een care femeia condamnat\u0103 era \u00een arest la domiciliu.<\/p>\n<p>Curtea Suprem\u0103 specific\u0103 apoi c\u0103, dac\u0103 locul de servire a <strong>deten\u021bie la domiciliu<\/strong> este acela\u0219i lucru \u00een care de\u021binutul a \u201ef\u0103cut\u201d arestul la domiciliu, din acest motiv acest loc nu poate fi considerat nepotrivit.<br \/>\nMai mult, potrivit Cur\u021bii Supreme, Curtea de Supraveghere nu a dovedit c\u0103 de\u021binuta, \u00een timpul deten\u021biei la domiciliu, care a durat patru ani \u0219i \u0219ase luni, a men\u021binut leg\u0103turi cu asocia\u021bia Camorra.<br \/>\n\u00cen concluzie, Curtea de Casa\u021bie a anulat ordinul cu referire la \u201erespingerea\u201d deten\u021biei la domiciliu cu trimiterea c\u0103tre Curtea de Supraveghere din Roma.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/blog\/\">Pute\u021bi r\u0103m\u00e2ne informat cu privire la \u0219tirile juridice prin intermediul blogului nostru<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Affidamento in prova ai servizi sociali, semilibert\u00e0 e detenzione domiciliare &nbsp; Quando \u00e8 ammissibile anche per i camorristi. &nbsp; Il caso. Il Tribunale di sorveglianza di Roma rigettava la richiesta della condannata di poter fruire del differimento della pena per grave infermit\u00e0, dell\u2019affidamento in prova ai servizi sociali, della semilibert\u00e0 e della detenzione domiciliare. Inoltre, [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1244,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_mbp_gutenberg_autopost":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[167,168,165],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1243"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1243"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1243\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}