{"id":1222,"date":"2021-05-11T09:24:51","date_gmt":"2021-05-11T07:24:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/?p=1222"},"modified":"2021-05-10T20:17:46","modified_gmt":"2021-05-10T18:17:46","slug":"stalking-occhio-alle-dichiarazioni-della-vittima","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/stalking-occhio-alle-dichiarazioni-della-vittima\/","title":{"rendered":"Urm\u0103rire: fii atent la declara\u021biile victimei"},"content":{"rendered":"

C\u00e2nd ordinul de custodie preventiv\u0103 \u00eempotriva suspectului pentru infrac\u021biunea de urm\u0103rire poate fi anulat.<\/h1>\n

Tribunalul Libert\u0103\u021bii a respins cererea de revizuire a suspectului pentru infrac\u021biunea de acte persecutorii<\/strong>.
\nSuspectul a apelat la Curtea Suprem\u0103, sus\u021bin\u00e2nd c\u0103 Revizuire<\/strong> nu luase \u00een considerare noile motive \u0219i declara\u021biile persoanei v\u0103t\u0103mate produse de ap\u0103rare (\u00een urma investiga\u021biilor defensive) de semn opus comparativ cu ceea ce a fost raportat de victima urm\u0103ririi \u00een fa\u021ba poli\u021biei judiciare.<\/p>\n

Il Tribunalul Libert\u0103\u021bii<\/strong> \u00een schimb, s-a limitat la evaluarea a ceea ce a spus persoana ofensat\u0103 \u00een fa\u021ba poli\u021biei, din ale c\u0103rei declara\u021bii a reie\u0219it existen\u021ba faptelor atribuite suspectului, care amenin\u021base persoana v\u0103t\u0103mat\u0103 cu un r\u0103u nedrept chiar \u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 p\u0103trund\u0103 \u00een casa sa.<\/p>\n

Investiga\u021biile defensive.<\/h2>\n

Pe de alt\u0103 parte, un alt adev\u0103r a reie\u0219it din declara\u021biile ulterioare ale persoanei v\u0103t\u0103mate f\u0103cute inculpatului suspectului \u00een timpul investiga\u021biilor defensive.
\n\u00cen primul r\u00e2nd, conduit\u0103 repetat\u0103<\/strong> pe care legea o impune pentru configurarea infrac\u021biunii de urm\u0103rirea<\/strong>, av\u00e2nd \u00een schimb conduita a avut loc \u00een doar 12 ore.
\nO astfel de conduit\u0103, de asemenea, nu ar fi cauzat de fapt victima urm\u0103ririi a stare persistent\u0103 \u0219i sever\u0103 de anxietate<\/strong>, nici nu ar fi implicat o schimbarea obiceiurilor de via\u021b\u0103 ale persoanei v\u0103t\u0103mate<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Practic, elementele constitutive ale infrac\u021biunii men\u021bionate laart\u0103. 612 bis<\/strong> din Codul penal<\/strong> \u0219i, \u00een consecin\u021b\u0103, nevoile de precau\u021bie ale suspectului.<\/p>\n

De fapt, Casarea, av\u00e2nd Curtea de Revizuire omis\u0103 s\u0103 ia \u00een considerare declara\u021biile ulterioare ale persoanei v\u0103t\u0103mate, provoc\u00e2nd astfel o lips\u0103 evident\u0103 de motiva\u021bie (deoarece noile motive de ap\u0103rare erau legate de aceste noi declara\u021bii) anuleaz\u0103 ordinul atacat.
\nCurtea Suprem\u0103 precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103 Tribunalul pentru Libertate va trebui s\u0103 evalueze fiabilitatea celor originale declara\u021biile victimei urm\u0103ririi<\/strong>, negat de anchetele defensive efectuate de ap\u0103rare.<\/p>\n

Cum s\u0103 efectua\u021bi \u00een mod corespunz\u0103tor investiga\u021bii defensive.<\/h3>\n

\u00centr-un alt caz, Curtea a considerat c\u0103 sunt nule investiga\u021biile defensive ata\u0219ate cererii de revizuire, deoarece ap\u0103r\u0103torul anterior nu putea investiga dec\u00e2t acelea\u0219i subiecte de anchet\u0103, dar, adres\u00e2nd acelea\u0219i \u00eentreb\u0103ri care fuseser\u0103 deja puse de Poli\u021bia Judiciar\u0103, nu putea reveni\u021bi la r\u0103spunsurile date pentru a ob\u021bine informa\u021bii diferite deoarece acest lucru ar fi integrat o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a art. 391 bis cpp<\/strong> paragraful 4.<\/p>\n

Pute\u021bi r\u0103m\u00e2ne informat cu privire la \u0219tirile juridice prin intermediul blogului nostru<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Quando pu\u00f2 essere annullata l\u2019ordinanza di custodia cautelare a carico dell\u2019indagato per reato di stalking . Il Tribunale della Libert\u00e0 rigettava la richiesta di riesame da parte dell\u2019indagato per il reato di atti persecutori. L\u2019indagato proponeva ricorso per Cassazione adducendo che il Riesame non aveva preso in considerazione i motivi nuovi e le dichiarazioni della […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1223,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[162,161],"class_list":["post-1222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cronaca","tag-offesa","tag-stalking"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1222"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1222\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/labfirm.it\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}